Single Crystal and Polycrystalline
These represent the "traditional" technologies. They can be grouped into the category "crystalline silicon". Single
crystal is the original PV technology invented in 1955, and never known to wear out. Polycrystalline entered the
market in 1981. It is similar in performance and reliability. Single crystal modules are composed of cells cut from a
piece of continuous crystal. The material forms a cylinder which is sliced into thin circular wafers. To minimize
waste, the cells may be fully round or they may be trimmed into other shapes, retaining more or less of the original
circle. Because each cell is cut from a single crystal, it has a uniform color which is dark blue.
Polycrystalline cells are made from similar silicon material except that instead of being grown into a single crystal, it
is melted and poured into a mold. This forms a square block that can be cut into square wafers with less waste of
space or material than round single-crystal wafers. As the material cools it crystallizes in an imperfect manner,
forming random crystal boundaries. The efficiency of energy conversion is slightly lower. This merely means that the
size of the finished module is slightly greater per watt than most single crystal modules. The cells look different from
single crystal cells. The surface has a jumbled look with many variations of blue color. In fact, they are quite
beautiful like sheets of gemstone.
In addition to the above processes, some companies have developed alternatives such as ribbon growth and growth
of crystalline film on glass. Most crystalline silicon technologies yield similar results, with high durability. Twenty-year
warranties are common for crystalline silicon modules. Single crystal tends to be slightly smaller in size per watt of
power output, and slightly more expensive than polycrystalline.
The construction of finished modules from crystalline silicon cells is generally the same, regardless of the technique of
crystal growth. The most common construction is by laminating the cells between a tempered glass front and a
plastic backing, using a clear adhesive similar to that used in automotive safety glass. It is then framed with aluminum.
The silicon used to produce crystalline modules is derived from sand. It is the second most common element on Earth,
so why is it so expensive? The answer is that in order to produce the photovoltaic effect, it must be purified to an
extremely high degree. Such pure "semiconductor grade" silicon is very expensive to produce. It is also in high demand
in the electronics industry because it is the base material for computer chips and other devices. Crystalline solar cells
are about the thickness of a human fingernail. They use a relatively large amount of silicon.
Thin Film Technologies
Imagine if a PV cell was made with a microscopically thin deposit of silicon, instead of a thick wafer. It would use very
little of the precious material. Now, imagine if it was deposited on a sheet of metal or glass, without the wasteful work
of slicing wafers with a saw. Imagine the individual cells deposited next to each other, instead of being mechanically
assembled. That is the idea behind thin film technology. (It is also called amorphous, meaning "not crystalline".) The
active material may be silicon, or it may be a more exotic material such as cadmium telluride.
Thin film panels can be made flexible and light weight by using plastic glazing. Some flexible panels can tolerate a bullet
hole without failing. Some of them perform slightly better than crystalline modules under low light conditions. They are
also less susceptible to power loss from partial shading of a module.
The disadvantages of thin film technology are lower efficiency and uncertain durability. Lower efficiency means that
more space and mounting hardware is required to produce the same power output. Thin film materials tend to be less
stable than crystalline, causing degradation over time. The technology is being greatly improved however, so I do not
wish to generalize in this article (written in late 1999). We will be seeing many new thin film products introduced in the
coming years, with efficiency and warranties that may approach those of crystalline silicon
PV experts generally agree that crystalline silicon will remain the "premium" technology for critical applications in remote
areas. Thin film will be strong in the "consumer" market where price is a critical factor. As usual, you get what you pay for.
|